First I'll answer on the topic raised by an anonymous person who left comments. I'm not an expert in the field in vitro, but I'm Catholic and I go by word contained in the Scriptures. about life and death, which does not depend on us but from God. He is the giver of life and death.
vitro fertilization treatment of infertility is not a replacement fertility.
supernumerary embryos production is causing the problem, what to do with them in the future. Consequently, it is frozen, and eventually kills.
And some dry facts:
"first in vitro method does not cure infertility, it only removes the effect of this disease. Just as the pain reliever does not cure cause of the disease, but rather one of its symptoms, so the method of artificial fertilization gives a measurable effect of the unborn child, but it remains a disease of infertility. Please put the cartoons so that it is a method of treatment. It is not.
second In vitro fertilization is a normal process. Leaving aside the moral aspects, (which in a moment) you should know that children conceived in that process often are born with defects such as lower body weight, or greater exposure to children's eye cancer. To see this you do not need to be distinguished biologist, simply type in a search inquiry in vitro method to learn many of the issues mentioned in the media is not talking.
third Not every attempt in vitro fertilization would produce results. What is more, couples who have decided to take advantage of this type of process talk about long efforts, the numerous failed attempts and a multiplicity of formed embryos. ( note. Fasolika: hence the life of one child from the tube is paid for by the death of at least a dozen ). The question of whether the embryo is a human - the Church is of the opinion that this is the secular biologists and bioethicists have big doubts. In this case seems the most reasonable argument Holownia Simon, who said that they are even the slightest doubt as to whether this is a man to have a clear conscience Do not expose the embryo.
4th In vitro method is not the only chance - colloquially speaking - to circumvent the problem of infertility. In recent years, very strongly developed in other biological fields - naprotechnologia, whose effects are extremely large and promising hope that someday this disease will could be cured. For the more interested naprotechnologią: http://ekai.pl/serwis/?MID=14327
5th Maybe that is not dry, but an obvious question. What to do with embryos that have not been used? Freeze? Destroy? Devote to research? Less radical advocates of in vitro say about the adoption of such embryos. However, there is then a problem: how to prevent incest, which may occur after (embryos from biological point of view that are brothers and sisters in the future may yet bind to each other)? Topics are terribly difficult, and emerging doubts too large to decide on acceptance, not to mention a refund of this method.
At the end of the moral aspects .
man has no absolute right to have a child, may receive only a privilege. This argument should strongly affect all believers, especially for those who treat the Bible as Holy Scripture. Old, but also the New Testament talks about infertility. A sign of great grace of God in the Old Testament was a gift after numerous offspring ("Look toward heaven and count the stars if you can. So shall your descendants."), AIW New Testament example of Zechariah and Elizabeth, which is doing absolutely under the sun a couple who wants to have a baby says a lot in the subject. Someone might say - ok, but then it was not developed in medicine, the murderous way of life and opportunities for a child by means other than sexual intercourse. Yes, it was not, but certain principles which derive from the laws of nature do not change. And Mother Nature does not like interference in her job. Stirring in its duties is no longer the same fertilization and stuffed into a corresponding female hormones, and when it comes to this great temptation to tinker with the appearance and characteristics of mental and physical child, is the picture we have at hand. Combining the genetic code, which is responsible for design, maintain and even resistance to various diseases was brilliantly presented in the film 'Gattaca' Andrew Niccol. Something seemed to be in the formation of the film (1997), a pure abstraction, is today a real threat to the world. But this also is not talking. Almost no one cites a 'kremówkowego Pope', in which increasingly is created John Paul II, denouncing the matters in vitro clearly and emphatically: artificial insemination methods are not acceptable from the moral point of view. Skipping the obvious question of solution - adoption of children who are waiting per family. Difficult task, because forcing to love 'alien' (from the viewpoint of biology), provided, however, was after all the children in terms of infertility it! It is a pity that, and the procedure for adoption instead of being promoted in the media are marginalized issues raised.
Church saying 'no' in vitro not shown ignorance or misunderstanding in the very difficult issues, and most importantly ambiguous from the viewpoint of medicine. CDF acted very wisely. If there are doubts about the moral evaluation of the activity, the Church can not support accept it. committed too many mistakes in the past to now speak confidently and without hesitation 'yes', especially that undermine aspects of this method is at least a few. Drama Infertility affects many couples, however, can not seek to overcome the problems, regardless of the price that one pays. End never justifies the means, especially since these are embryos whose status (human or not human) medicine does not clearly defined. The enormous responsibility of which proponents of artificial insemination methods seem to forget. "
mfijolek
Source: Fronda.pl
glass production people
Robert Nęcek
child is entitled to a conception of marriage and because of act of love, not in the laboratory - by a Catholic priest, Fr. Robert Nęcek
Lots of noise caused the recent statement of Minister of Health Ewa Kopacz about the possibility of refunding, in vitro fertilization treatment from the state budget. The state budget - that is to say - the money pulled in the taxes on all citizens, including people who believe that respect teaching of the Church.
course, the State will do what he thinks, because doing so has the resources and opportunities. However, in this case a moral sensitivity of people identifying with the teaching of the Catholic Church. It is clear that the desire to have children is commendable, but can not take the dimension of any cost and by any means. The point is that the starting point for discussion on the application of biotechnology is not the idea of \u200b\u200bhuman dignity, but the desire to possess. Meanwhile, the dignity of people is the highest value! This means that no person should be treated objectively, but as an agent of our references.
Science Church considers artificial insemination to be shameful in itself, and contrary to the dignity of parental and spousal unity. It follows that the origin of the human person must be the result of mutual self-giving of spouses, and not the result of manipulation of biological and medical applications. Children have a right to conceive of marriage and because of act of love, not in the laboratory. Bioetyków world today warns that a child with a future production of the order - accepting his inalienable dignity and fundamental rights - it will resemble an elegant overview of the motorcycles, which have buy.
In confirmation of the thesis is worth noting the announcement by Iona Harris in 1999, online auction ova of the world's most beautiful models. Auction was to be help for childless couples fulfill their dreams of having a child with the highest standard of beauty and intelligence. Father of the first French test-tube baby, Jacques Testart in the book "Clear cell" writes ironically that the laboratories will be able to guarantee the finished "product" in line with EU standards. As in the pet shop you can select a child with physical condition, eye color and hair. In Australia, researchers have promoted advocating the extension of the right of parents to select children conceived in vitro depending on the desired characteristics. Julian Savulescu's called the proposal "Reproductive charity."
Savulescu went for Peter Singer, arguing that the dignity belonging only to those who have full autonomy. Therefore, children in the prenatal phase do not. Such an approach would cause the trade in human cells. There have been instances that when you run out of sperm donors, one of the institutes of obstetrics began men willing to pay. In this way, was "work" 400. These behaviors are inconsistent with the position of the Council of Europe Committee of Experts does not accept financial incentives. Moreover, no one mentions that the first attempts very expensive in vitro fertilization are usually unsuccessful, entailing the destruction of human embryos. Something inappropriate is also placing the public in confusion, in vitro fertilization is a method of treating human infertility. The naked eye can see that after fertilization extracorporeal infertile couple remains barren couple.
Church has the duty to remind Catholics of their teachings and principles arising from it. not require them to anyone. But the choice of belonging to a community of believers committed. Otherwise, we risk creating a personal rite of the Church, which Christ has little in common.
It is worth mentioning that at some time in the public polls. One throws up a password refund of contraceptives, other times it is referred to refund in vitro. According to this logic fertility and infertility should be regarded as a disease, depending on a person's life plans. Therefore, it is worth asking - when will mainly be reimbursed for treating the specific disease of heart, kidney and various types of cancer, because such diseases are the most? And the cost was not due! Incidentally - as mentioned by Archbishop Kazimierz Nycz - should simplify the rules on adoption, and promote adoptions, as orphaned children waiting for selfless love. "
The author is a spokesperson for the Archdiocese of Krakow and lecturer PAT
notes. kb
Republic
0 comments:
Post a Comment